Saturday, July 20, 2019
Narrative Worth in A Rose for Emily Essay -- A Rose For Emily, William
In ââ¬Å" A Rose for Emilyâ⬠, William Faulkner tells the complex tale of a woman who is battered by time and unable to move through life after the loss of each significant male figure in her life. Unlike Disney Stories, there is no prince charming to rescue fallen princess, and her assumed misery becomes the subject of everyone in the town of Jefferson, Mississippi. As the townspeople gossip about her and develop various scenarios to account for her behaviors and the unknown details of her life, Emily Grierson serves as a scapegoat for the lower classes to validate their lives. In telling this story, Faulkner decides to take an unusual approach; he utilizes a narrator to convey the details of a first-person tale, by examining chronology, the role of the narrator and the interpretations of ââ¬Å"A Rose for Emilyâ⬠, it can be seen that this story is impossible to tell without a narrator. As Faulkner begins ââ¬Å"A Rose for Emilyâ⬠with death of Emily, he both immediately and intentionally obscures the chronology of the short story to create a level of distance between the reader and the story and to capture the readerââ¬â¢s attention. Typically, the reader builds a relationship with each character in the story because the reader goes on a journey with the character. In ââ¬Å"A Rose for Emilyâ⬠, Faulkner ââ¬Å"weaves together the events of Emilyââ¬â¢s lifeâ⬠is no particular order disrupting the journey for the reader (Burg, Boyle and Lang 378). Instead, Faulkner creates a mandatory alternate route for the reader. He ââ¬Å"sends the reader on a dizzying voyage by referring to specific moments in time that have no central referent, and thus the weaves the past into the present, the present into the past. ââ¬Å"Since the reader is denied this connection with the characters, the na... ... Works Cited 1. Burg, Jennifer, Anne Boyle and Sheau-Dong Lang. ââ¬Å"Using Constraint Logic Programming to Analyze the Chronology in A Rose of Emilyâ⬠. Computer and the humanities (2000): 377-392 2. Faulkner, William ââ¬Å"A Rose for Emilyâ⬠. Schilb, John and John Clifford ââ¬Å"Making Literature Matters: An Anthropology for Readers and Writersâ⬠, Boston and New York: Bedford/St. Martinââ¬â¢s, 2009. 667-675 3. Perry, Manakhelm ââ¬Å"Literary Dynamics: How the Order of a Text Creates Its Meanings [With an Analysis of Faulknerââ¬â¢s ââ¬Å"A rose for Emilyâ⬠] Poetics today (1979). 35-65+311-365 4. Skinner, John ââ¬Å"A Rose for Emily: Against Interpretation. ââ¬Å"Journal of Narrative Techniqueâ⬠(1985): 42-51 5. Sullivan, Ruth ââ¬Å"The Narrator in A rose for Emilyâ⬠. Journal of Narrative Technique (1971): 159-178 6. Watkins, Floyd C. ââ¬Å"The Structure of A Rose for Emilyâ⬠. Modern Language Notes (1954): 508-510
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.